Everything Totally Explained


Ask & we'll explain, totally!
Essex class aircraft carrier
Totally Explained


  NEW! All the latest news in the worlds of computer gaming, entertainment, the environment,  
finance, health, politics, science, stocks & shares, technology and much, much, more.  


View this entry using RSS

Everything about Essex Class Aircraft Carrier totally explained

Essex was a class of aircraft carriers of the United States Navy, which constituted the 20th century's most numerous class of heavy warships, with 24 ships built. These included members of the "long-hull" Ticonderoga variant/subclass, which some consider a separate class. Thirty-two were originally ordered, however six were cancelled before construction, and two were cancelled after construction had begun. The Essex-class, along with the three Midway-class carriers, were the backbone of the Navy's combat strength from the later years of World War II, until the supercarriers began to come into the fleet in numbers during the 1960s and 1970s.

Overview

The preceding Yorktown-class carriers formed the basis from which the Essex class was developed. Designed to carry a larger air group, and unencumbered by pre-war naval treaty limits, the (CV-9) was over sixty feet longer, nearly ten feet wider in beam and more than a third heavier. A longer, wider flight deck and a deck-edge elevator facilitated more efficient aviation operations, enhancing the ship's offensive and defensive air power. Machinery arrangement and armor protection was greatly improved from previous designs. These features, plus the provision of more anti-aircraft guns, gave the ships much enhanced survivability. In fact, none of the Essex-class carriers were lost and two of them, and, came home under their own power even after receiving heavy damage.
   US carriers had the same amount of deck armor as that carried by their British counterparts. While debates raged, and continue to this day, regarding the effect of strength deck location (flight deck level on British ships vs. hangar deck level on American ships), British designers' comments tended to disparage the use of deck armor, but some historians, such as D.K. Brown in Nelson to Vanguard, see the American arrangement to have been superior, until the larger size of the first supercarriers necessitated a deeper hull, and thus moving the strength deck to the flight deck.

Development

After the abrogation by Japan from disarmament treaties, the U.S. took a realistic look at its naval strength. With the Naval Expansion Act of Congress passed on May 17, 1938, an increase of 40,000 tons in aircraft carriers was authorized. This permitted the building of (CV-8) and (CV-9) which was to become the lead ship of its class.
   CV-9 was to be the prototype of the 27,000-ton (standard displacement) aircraft carrier, considerably larger than the yet smaller than the (a battlecruiser converted to a carrier). These were to become known as the Essex-class carriers, although this classification was later dropped in the 1950s. On September 9, 1940, eight more of these carriers were ordered and were to become the,, (CV -14),,,, and . The last two of the 13 originally programmed CV-9 class aircraft carriers, and, were ordered on December 15, 1941. It should be noted that the Lexington, Wasp, Hornet and the Yorktown names were not their originally intended ones, but were used in line with the Navy’s intent to carry on the traditions of their fighting predecessors who were lost during combat in 1942. It should also be noted that of the original 13 ordered Essex-class ships, several of them, the Ticonderoga (CV-14), Randolph (CV-15), Hancock (CV-19), and Boxer (CV-21) were modified during construction as part of the "long hull" group, with the bow extended into a "clipper" shape to provide room for additional anti-aircraft armament.
   Nineteen more Essex-class ships were ordered or scheduled, starting with ten of them on August 7, 1942. Only two of the ships, the and the were laid down as Essex "short hull" keels. The remainder became the Ticonderoga or "long hull" class ships. CV-16 was originally laid down as the Cabot, but was renamed Lexington during construction after the was lost in the Battle of the Coral Sea in May 1942; she was commissioned on February 17, 1943. CV-10, originally to be named the Bon Homme Richard, was renamed after the was lost at the Battle of Midway on June 7, 1942. CV-18's name was changed from Oriskany after the was sunk in September 1942 in the South Pacific while escorting a troop convoy to Guadalcanal, and the CV-12's name was changed from Kearsarge after the was lost in October 1942 in the Battle of Santa Cruz Islands.
   In summary, during WWII and until its conclusion by Allied forces, the US Navy ordered 32 aircraft carriers of the Essex- and the related Ticonderoga-class, of which the keels of 26 were laid down, 24 actually being commissioned.

Design

In drawing up the preliminary design for USS Essex (CV-9), particular attention was directed at the size of both her flight and hangar decks. Aircraft design had come a long way from the comparatively light planes used in carriers during the 1930s. Flight decks now required more takeoff space for the heavier fighters and bombers being developed. Most of the first-line carriers of the pre-war years were equipped with flush deck catapults, but owing to the speed and size of these ships very little catapulting was done — except for experimental purposes.
   With the advent of war, airplane weights began to go up as armor and armament got heavier; crew size aboard the planes also increased. By the war’s end in 1945, catapult launchings would become more common under these circumstances with some carrier commanding officers reporting that as much as 40% of launchings were effected by the ships’ catapults.
   The hangar area design came in for many design conferences between the naval bureaus. Not only were the supporting structures to the flight deck to carry the increased weight of the landing and parked aircraft, but they were to have sufficient strength to support the storing of spare fuselages and parts (50% of each plane type aboard) under the flight deck and still provide adequate working space for the men using the area below.
   A startling innovation in the Essex was a port-side deck-edge elevator in addition to two inboard elevators. Earlier, experiments with a ramp arrangement between the hangar and flight decks, up which aircraft were hauled by crane proved too slow. The Navy's Bureau of Ships and the Chief Engineer of A.B.C. Elevator Co. designed the engine for the side elevator. Essentially, it was a standard elevator, 60 by 34 ft (18 by 10 m) in platform surface, which traveled vertically on the port side of the ship. The design was a huge success which greatly improved flight deck operations over carriers prior to the Essex.
Since there was no large hole in the flight deck when the elevator is in the ‘down’ position, a critical factor if the elevator were to ever become inoperable during combat operations, the development of the side elevator was a significant improvement in flight operations. Its new position made it easier to continue normal operations on deck, irrespective of the position of the elevator. The elevator also increased the effective deck space when it was in the ‘up’ position by providing additional parking room outside the normal contours of the flight deck, and increased the effective area on the hangar deck by the absence of elevator pits. In addition its machinery was less complex than the two inboard elevators, requiring about 20% fewer man-hours of maintenance.
   Ongoing improvements to the class were made, particularly with regards to the ventilation system, lighting systems and the trash burner design and implementation.
   These carriers had better protecting armor than their predecessors, better facilities for handling ammunition, safer and greater fueling capacity, and more effective damage control equipment.
   The tactical employment of U.S. carriers changed as the war progressed. In early operations, through 1942, the doctrine was to operate singly or in pairs, joining together for the offense and separating when on the defense—the theory being that a separation of carriers under attack not only provided a protective screen for each but also dispersed the targets and divided the enemy’s attack. Combat experience in those early operations didn't bear out the theory, and new proposals for tactical deployment were the subject of much discussion.
   As the new Essex- and Independence-class carriers became available, tactics changed. Experience taught the wisdom of combined strength. Under attack, the combined anti-aircraft fire of a task group's carriers and their screen provided a more effective umbrella of protection against marauding enemy aircraft than was possible when the carriers separated.
   When two or more of these task groups supported each other, they constituted a fast carrier task force. Lessons learned from operating the carriers as a single group of six, as two groups of three, and three groups of two, provided the basis for many tactics which later characterized carrier task force operations, with the evolution of the fast carrier task force and its successful employment in future operations.

Armaments

"Sunday Punch"

The pride of the carrier, known as the "Sunday Punch", was the offensive power of 36 fighters, 36 dive bombers and 18 torpedo planes. The F6F Hellcat would prove to be superior to the Japanese Zero. It was twice as powerful as the Zero and could therefore climb higher and fly faster. Due to the advantage in power, the Hellcat could carry an enormous amount of firepower, boasting six .50 caliber (12.7 mm) machine guns with a rate of fire of over 1,000 rounds per minute. The SB2C-1 Helldiver was a dive-bomber with a capacity of 2,650 pounds (1,200 kg) of ordnance or one torpedo. The Grumman TBF/TBM Avenger was designed as a torpedo plane but often used in other attack roles. Some Essex-class carriers, such as the, also included squadrons of F4U Corsairs in Fighter-Bomber squadrons (VBFs), the precursor to modern Fighter-Attack (VFA) squadrons.

Guns, radar and radios

The defensive plan for the carriers was to use radio and radar in a combined effort to concentrate anti-aircraft fire.
   The ship boasted four twin 5 in (127 mm) gun turrets, seventeen quad-barrel, 40 mm, anti-aircraft guns and 65 single, 20 mm, close-in defense guns. With a range of ten miles and a rate of fire of fifteen rounds per minute, the 5-inch guns fired the deadly VT shells. The VT shells, known as proximity fuzed-shells, would detonate when they came within of an enemy aircraft. The 5-inch guns could also aim into the water, creating waterspouts which could bring down low flying aircraft such as torpedo planes. The Bofors 40 mm guns were a significant improvement over the 1.1"/75 (28 mm) guns mounted on the earlier Lexington and Yorktown classes.
   The Essex class also made use of advanced technological and communications equipment. The Mark 4 sweeping radar was installed but couldn't track incoming low-level intruders and was quickly replaced with the improved Mark 12 radar. The Plan Position Indicator (PPI) radar was used to keep track of ships and enabled a multi-carrier force to maintain a high-speed formation at night or in foul weather. The new navigational tool known as the Dead Reckoning Tracer was also implemented for navigation and tracking of surface ships. The Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) was used to identify hostile ships and aircraft, especially at night or in adverse weather. The four-channel very high frequency (VHF) radio permitted channel variation in an effort to prevent enemy interception of transmissions. A four-channel radio also allowed for simultaneous radio contact with other ships and planes in the taskforce.

The "long-hull" Essexes

Throughout the very large program to build Essex-class aircraft carriers, modifications were constantly made. The number of 40 mm and 20 mm anti-aircraft cannons was greatly increased, new and improved radars were added, the original hangar deck catapult installation was taken out completely, the ventilation system was massively revised, details of protection were altered and hundreds of other large and small changes were executed. In fact, to the skilled observer, no two ships of the class looked exactly the same.
   Beginning in March 1943, one visually very significant change was authorized for ships then in the early stages of construction. This involved reshaping the bow into a rather elegant "clipper" form to provide deck space for two 40 mm quadruple gun mountings, thus greatly improving forward air defenses. Thirteen ships were completed to this "long-hull", or Ticonderoga, class. Four of these were finished in 1944, in time to join their short-hull Essex-class sisters in Pacific combat operations. The rest went into commission between early 1945 and late 1946.

Post-war rebuilds

Their construction greatly accelerated, the Essex class formed the backbone of the Navy's mobile air striking power during the climactic years of the Pacific War. Due to their large and spacious hangars, and the innovation of the angled flight deck, they could easily accommodate jet aircraft. With their larger contemporaries of the Midway class, these carriers sustained the Navy's air power through the rest of the 1940s, during the Korean War era and beyond.
   Five of the long-hulls were laid up in 1946–47, along with all of the short-hulls. Eight stayed on active duty to form, with the three much larger Midways, the backbone of the post-war Navy's combat strength. Though the Truman administration's defense economies sent three of the active Essexes into "mothballs" in 1949, these soon came back into commission after the Korean War began. Ultimately, all thirteen had active Cold War service.
   Five of them were thoroughly rebuilt in the early 1950s under the SCB-27 program, and four of these were further modernized a few years later to the SCB-125 design. Another got a combined SCB-27 and SCB-125 redo, while yet another was given a modest reworking to test the revolutionary "angled deck" landing area.
   Even after the arrival of the Forrestal-type "super carriers", the Essex class remained vital elements of naval strength. By the mid-1950s, fourteen of them had been modernized along the lines of Oriskany (CV-34), with all but one of those being further updated under the SCB-125 program to facilitate operation of high-performance fighters and heavy attack aircraft.
   Korean War and subsequent Cold War needs ensured that twenty-two of the twenty-four ships had extensive post-World War II service, all initially with attack air groups. As bigger carriers entered the fleet, 18 of the Essex-class vessels were reassigned to the anti-submarine warfare (ASW) mission. Unmodernized ships began to leave active service in the late 1950s, but three had about a decade of additional duty as helicopter assault transports for the Marine Corps. The updated units remained active until age and the increasing fleet of supercarriers drove them from the high seas from the late 1960s into the middle 1970s. However, one of the very first of the type,, ran on until 1991 as the Navy's training carrier.
   Of the six unmodernized long-hull Essexes, three decommissioned in the late 1950s and early 1960s and were promptly reclassified as aircraft transports (AVT), reflecting their very limited ability to safely operate modern aircraft. The other three, converted to Landing Platform Helicopter (LPH) amphibious assault ships, were active until about 1970. The two least modernized units went into reserve in the mid-1960s, and the rest passed out of the active fleet between 1969 and 1976. All were scrapped, most in the 1970s, although Shangri-La survived until the late 1980s.

The Space Program

Several of the Essex-class ships played a part in the Apollo program, as recovery ships for unmanned and manned spaceflights, from 1966 to 1973. On February 26, 1966, Boxer recovered the command module from AS-201, the first unmanned flight of a production Apollo Command and Service Module. AS-202, another sub-orbital test flight of the command module, was recovered in August by Hornet (CV-12); the command module from that flight is currently on display aboard Hornet.
   Eleven months later, Essex recovered the astronauts of Apollo 7, the first manned mission in the Apollo program, after eleven days in orbit. recovered the astronauts of Apollo 8, after their historic first manned flight around the Moon in December 1968; and recovered the second crew to orbit the Moon aboard Apollo 10 in May 1969. Hornet re-entered the space program and played a significant part in history when she recovered the astronauts from the first two moon landing missions, Apollo 11 in July 1969 and Apollo 12 in November. The first steps on Earth of returning moonwalkers Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin, with Command Module Pilot Michael Collins, are marked on her hangar deck, as part of her Apollo program exhibit. The three subsequent missions utilized amphibious assault ships as support vessels; however, Ticonderoga recovered the astronauts of the last two moon missions, Apollo 16 and Apollo 17 in April and December of 1972.
   In the post-Apollo era, Ticonderoga again acted as a recovery ship for the astronauts of the Skylab 2 mission, the first manned mission to Skylab, the first U.S. orbital space station, in June 1973.

The Ships Today

Four of the Essex-class ships have been preserved, and opened to the public as museums: Until USS Midway opened at San Diego, every preserved carrier in the US was an Essex-class ship.
    was sunk in 2006 to form an artificial reef off the coast of Pensacola, Florida.

The Essex class ships

  Ship b>Keel laid b>Launched Commissioned Decommissioned Fate
  April 1941   July 1942   December 1942   June 1969   Scrapped (June 1975)
  December 1941   January 1943   April 1943   June 1970   Museum (October 1975)
  December 1941   April 1943   August 1943   March 1974   Museum (August 1982)
  August 1942   August 1943   November 1943   June 1970   Museum (July 1989)
  December 1942   October 1943   January 1944   February 1947   Scrapped (August 1966)
  February 1943   February 1944   May 1944   September 1973   Scrapped (September 1975)
  May 1943   June 1944   October 1944   February 1969   Scrapped (May 1975)
  July 1941   September 1942   February 1943   November 1991   Museum (June 1992)
  September 1941   December 1942   May 1943   January 1947   Scrapped (May 1973)
  March 1942   August 1943   November 1943   July 1972   Scrapped (May 1973)
  January 1943   October 1944   April 1944   January 1976   Scrapped (September 1976)
  December 1942   February 1944   August 1944   January 1970   Scrapped (January 1994)
  September 1943   December 1944   April 1945   December 1969   Scrapped (February 1971)
  February 1943   April 1944   November 1944   July 1971   Scrapped (March 1992)
  February 1944   August 1945   April 1946   May 1959   Scrapped (March 1970)
  March 1944   May 1945   March 1946   February 1970   Scrapped (September 1970)
  May 1944   October 1945   September 1950   September 1976   Scuttled (May 2006)
  March 1943   August 1944   January 1945   May 1963   Scrapped (February 1974)
  September 1943   July 1945   November 1945   January 1970   Scrapped (May 1971)
USS Shangri-La (CV-38)   January 1943   February 1944   September 1944   July 1971   Scrapped (August 1998)
  March 1943   November 1944   June 1945   May 1966   Scrapped (April 1972)
  March 1943   May 1945   November 1945   June 1967   Scrapped (October 1968)
  September 1944   November 1945   November 1946   January 1970   Scrapped (October 1971)
  August 1944   September 1945   May 1946   December 1958   Scrapped (March 1971)
The was ordered and laid down as an Essex-class vessel, was completed in 1950 to the much modified SCB-27A design.
   , laid down in July 1944 at the New York Navy Yard and launched in 1945, was scrapped incomplete after tests; and was laid down at Newport News Shipbuilding yards in January 1945 but cancelled in August 1945 and broken up on the shipways.
   Six fiscal-year 1945 ships, none of which received names, were assigned to Bethlehem Steel Company (CV-50), New York Navy Yard (CVs 51 & 52), Philadelphia Navy Yard (CV-53) and Norfolk Navy Yard (CVs 54 and 55). Their construction was cancelled in March 1945.

Further Information

Get more info on 'Essex Class Aircraft Carrier'.


External Link Exchanges

Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:

    <a href="http://essex_class_aircraft_carrier.totallyexplained.com">Essex class aircraft carrier Totally Explained</a>

Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
   As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned.



Copyright © 2007-8 totallyexplained.com | Licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License | Site Map
This article contains text from the Wikipedia article Essex class aircraft carrier (History) and is released under the GFDL | RSS Version